This paper circulates around the core theme of Write an Evaluation Report. You are expected to draw on what you have learned in Modules One, Two and Three of Course Design, Delivery and Evaluation. together with its essential aspects. It has been reviewed and purchased by the majority of students thus, this paper is rated 4.8 out of 5 points by the students. In addition to this, the price of this paper commences from £ 99. To get this paper written from the scratch, order this assignment now. 100% confidential, 100% plagiarism-free.
Write an Evaluation Report. You are expected to draw on what you have learned in Modules One, Two and Three of Course Design, Delivery and Evaluation. To demonstrate your
Understanding of these concepts you are asked to review literature, select a curriculum context, design an evaluation protocol and apply it by
Evaluating the curriculum context you selected, and then write a report encompassing all phases of your evaluation of the identified curriculum. Your written report should be no more than 3000 words in length, plus references and appendices where
Analyse the concepts and processes of curriculum design
Examine flexible approaches to curriculum design, including the foundations and issues associated with online /technologically-mediated learning
Embed, use and critically reflect upon the use of learning technologies in curriculum design
Assess standards and issues in curriculum evaluation, evaluation models, types, methods and tools
Apply discipline knowledge
(use analytical skills to solve problems)
(confidence to investigate new ideas)
The executive summary provides an insightful, concise detailed overview of the purpose, scope, achievements, main points, conclusions and recommendations contained in the report.
Review of Literature
A detailed review of relevant literature is included and integrated throughout the report. Key concepts are analysed, evaluated and reflected upon. An extensive range of sources are included.
The context, rationale, methodology, results, findings, conclusion, recommendations and evaluation protocol included in Appendix are exceptionally well aligned to course concepts, described and explained in detail and supported by reference to an extensive range of sources.
Academic writing standard
The report is exceptionally well written in a suitable structure. Professionally presented. Organisation of sentences and paragraphs gives high degree of clarity and flow.
Point of view and style are appropriate throughout.
Contains virtually no typographical or spelling and punctuation errors.
APA referencing technique
An extensive range of sources cited using APA referencing correctly and consistently throughout.
All cited references included in the end of text reference list.
Belanger, D. (2016). Educational standards are important guidelines that prescribe what students should learn. [Weblog]. Retrieved from https://teachnowdbelanger.wordpress.com/2016/10/17/understanding-and-applying-standards/
Bernstein, J. L. (2014). Review of University Teaching in Focus: A Learning-Centred Approach. Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal, 2(1), 3-4. https://dx.doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.2.1.3
Biggs, J. (2012). What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(1), 39-55. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.642839
Caffarella, R. S. (2002). Planning Programs for Adult Learners: A Practical Guide for Educators, Trainers, and Staff Developers (2nd ed.). (pp. 166-202). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (2003).Qualitative difference in university teaching, in Malcolm Tight (Ed.), Access and Exclusion: International Perspectives on Higher Education Research, (pp.185-216). United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Gazioğlu, S. (2012). Online course design: a statistics course example. Teaching Statistics An International Journal for Teachers, 35(2), 98-102. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9639.2012.00523.x
Gehlen-Baum, V., Weinberger, A., Pohl, A., & Bry, F. (2014). Open Learning and Teaching in Educational Communities. In C. Rensing (Ed.), Technology Use in Lectures to Enhance Students’ Attention, (pp. 125-137). Switzerland: Springer.
Hicks, O. (2007). Curriculum in higher education in Australia – Hello?, in Enhancing Higher Education, Theory and Scholarship, Proceedings of the 30th HERDSA Annual Conference [CD-ROM], Adelaide, 8-11 July.
Land, R. (2012). Discipline-based teaching. In L. Hunt & D. Chalmers (Eds.), UNIVERSITY TEACHING IN FOCUS: A learning-centered approach, (pp. 38-55). New York, USA: Routledge.
Loveland, T. (2012).Educational Technology and Technology Education. In P. J. Williams (Ed.), Technology Education for Teachers, (pp. 115-136). Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Osborn, P. G. (2004). Book Review: The Three Dimensions of Learning: Contemporary Learning Theory in the Tension Field Between the Cognitive, the Emotional and the Social. Adult Education Quarterly, 55(1), 72-73. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1177/0741713604268897
Stromquist, N. (2004). The educational nature of feminist action. In G. Foley (Ed.) Dimensions of adult learning. Adult education and training in a global era, (pp. 35-52). NSW: Allen & Unwin.
Stewart, M. (2013). UNDERSTANDING LEARNING: THEORIES AND CRITIQUE. In L. Hunt & D. Chalmers (Eds.), UNIVERSITY TEACHING IN FOCUS: A learning-centered approach, (pp. 3-18). New York, USA: Routledge.
Smaldino, S. E., Lowther, D. L., & Russell, J.D. (2008). Instructional Technology and Media for Learning (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc.
Tracey, M. W., & Baaki, J. (2014). Design, designers, and reflection-in-action. In B. Hokanson & A. Gibbons (Eds.), Design in educational technology: Design thinking, design process, and the design studio, (pp. 1-13). New York: Springer.
Tuckman, B. W., & Harper, B. E. (2012). CONDUCTING EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, (6th ed.). United Kingdom: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc.