This is an essay in which you will critically analyse the nature of ‘food’ and also ‘democracy’ by comparing one example from each of the two food systems:

This paper circulates around the core theme of This is an essay in which you will critically analyse the nature of ‘food’ and also ‘democracy’ by comparing one example from each of the two food systems: together with its essential aspects. It has been reviewed and purchased by the majority of students thus, this paper is rated 4.8 out of 5 points by the students. In addition to this, the price of this paper commences from £ 99. To get this paper written from the scratch, order this assignment now. 100% confidential, 100% plagiarism-free.

Essay – Examining ‘Food’ and ‘Democracy

This is an essay in which you will critically analyse the nature of ‘food’ and also ‘democracy’ by comparing one example from each of the two food systems:

(i) The Industrial Food system example  ie a supermarket, and

(ii) The Alternative Food system example ie you choose ONE example of food democracy in practice at individual or community level.

• This could be growing food at home, farmer’s markets, backyard food swaps, community gardens

  The essay task

  As part of your written essay, you should ensure that you cover the following :

• What do you notice about the fundamentals of ‘democracy’ in both examples (supermarket + the one you chose)?
• Compare and contrast each example: What do you notice in each site?
• What stands out in terms of “food” in each example?
• What stands out in terms of “democracy” and it’s principles in each example?
• Use food democracy as a lens to examine how consumers are given choice or invited to participate (or not, as the case may be) in each example

Assessment Criteria
1-Demonstrates an understanding of the key principles and types of democracy and how these may be applied to different food systems (Industrial & Alternative)

2-Describes the ways in which democratic principles may be applied to food/ food systems in the context of public health

3-Demonstrates an understanding of the concepts of food citizenship and civic agriculture

• General assessment criteria

1. Provides a lucid Introduction that relates your paper to public health issues generally
2. Shows a sophisticated understanding of the key issues
3. Shows the ability to interpret relevant information and literature in relation to the topic
4. Shows evidence of reading beyond the core and recommended reading
5. Justifies any conclusions reached with well formed academic arguments, not merely assertion
6. Complies with normal academic standards of legibility, referencing and bibliographic details
7. Is clearly written and logically structured with accurate spelling, grammar, sentence & paragraph construction

Back up your analysis/ arguments in the essay using the academic literature. Do not cite the Topic Study Guide.

• The readings from this Topic, should provide you with the bulk of references, but depending on your example you may need to track down other information.
• As far as possible use South Australian / Australian examples of food democracy. Today’s lecture will direct you to some good examples. Do not use International examples.
• Ensure that you allocate equal space for analysing each food system example in your essay. For example, avoid spending 2/3rds of your essay discussing supermarkets and only 1/3rd on say, “farmer’s markets”. Should be roughly 50:50.

  This is a formal academic essay, so please include:

  • a brief introduction – this should introduce the task with respect to public health, your chosen examples (supermarket & one other) to critically analyse, define any terms/concepts and outline the structure of the essay.
  • Structure the body of your essay as logical and sequential paragraphs – each paragraph should contain a point in your argument.
  • A conclusion – this should be a summary of your key arguments that you have already presented in the paper and well as a final statement about food democracy and public health
  • Use as many sub-headings as you think appropriate to structure your work.
  • Write clearly and concisely – don’t waffle