This paper circulates around the core theme of Test number one: The T- independent test was used to test the null hypothesis that crime perceptions between Oman and UK are equal against the alternative hypothesis that there is a difference. together with its essential aspects. It has been reviewed and purchased by the majority of students thus, this paper is rated 4.8 out of 5 points by the students. In addition to this, the price of this paper commences from £ 99. To get this paper written from the scratch, order this assignment now. 100% confidential, 100% plagiarism-free.
Test number one: The T- independent test was used to test the null hypothesis that crime perceptions between Oman and UK are equal against the alternative hypothesis that there is a difference.
Each participant that took part in answering any of the survey three domains is represented within the below data. Not all participants took part in answering all the questions in the survey.
Table 12:
| Crime assessment | Mean | Std. Deviation | P Value | Frequency |
| Male | 3.88 | 0.66 | 0.025 | 103 |
| Female | 4.1 | 0.69 | 0.025 | 99 |
There was a significant difference in the mean scores of crime assessment and shame for gender female (M= 4.10, SD= 0.69) and male (M= 3.88, SD= 0.66) conditions; t (200) = -2.258, p = 0.025.
Table 14:
| Crime Punishment | Mean | Std. Deviation | P Value | Frequency |
| Male | 3.325 | 0.5864 | 0.953 | 104 |
| Female | 3.33 | 0.5438 | 0.953 | 96 |
There was not a significant difference in the mean scores of crime punishment female (M= 3.33, SD= 0.54) male (M= 3.33, SD= 0.59) conditions; t (198) = -.058, p = 0.953.
Table 16:
| Crime seriousness Perception | Mean | Std. Deviation | P Value | Frequency |
| Males | 36.73 | 9.25 | 0.83 | 110 |
| Females | 36.47 | 8.14 | 0.83 | 94 |
There was not a significant difference in the mean scores of crime seriousness perceptions for female (M= 2.16, SD= 0.46) and male (M= 2.18, SD= 0.54) conditions; t (189) = 0.241, p = 0.810
Table 15:
| Crime Punishment | Mean | Std. Deviation | P Value | Frequency |
| United Kingdom | 3.385 | 0.4579 | 0.142 | 105 |
| Oman | 3.265 | 0.6604 | 0.142 | 95 |
There was not a significant) difference in the mean crime punishment scores for United Kingdom (M= 3.39, SD= 0.46) and Oman (M= 3.27, SD= 0.66) conditions; t (198) = 1.503, p = 0.142.
Table 13:
| Crime assessment | Mean | Std. Deviation | P Value | Frequency |
| United Kingdom | 4.08 | 0.63 | 0.05 | 106 |
| Oman | 3.89 | 0.73 | 0.05 | 96 |
There was a marginal significant difference in the mean crime assessment scores for United Kingdom (M= 4.10, SD= 0.63) and Oman (M= 3.89, SD= 0.73) conditions; t (200) = 1.938, p = 0.054.
Table 17:
| Perception | Mean | Std. Deviation | P Value | Frequency |
| United Kingdom | 40.8 | 7.83 | 0 | 106 |
| Oman | 32.07 | 7.31 | 0 | 98 |
There was a significant difference in the mean scores of crime seriousness perceptions for United Kingdom (M= 2.44, SD= 0.45) and Oman (M= 1.90, SD=0.42) conditions; t (189) = 7.960, p = 0.0001.
| Crime assessment item number | Cronbach Alpha | Crime assessment and shame item number | Cronbach Alpha | | Crime punishment item number | Cronbach Alpha | | | |
| | | | | | |
| 15 | 0.62 | 13 | 0.35 | | 17 | 0.86 | | | |
Cronbach’s Alpha for each of the three domains
