This paper circulates around the core theme of Review the article “Mutual Perception of Russian and French Managers” from The International Journal of Human Resource Management (Muratbekova-Touron, 2011) https://ezproxy.snhu.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthTyp together with its essential aspects. It has been reviewed and purchased by the majority of students thus, this paper is rated 4.8 out of 5 points by the students. In addition to this, the price of this paper commences from £ 99. To get this paper written from the scratch, order this assignment now. 100% confidential, 100% plagiarism-free.
6-3 HR Article Analysis: Improving Performance
Review the article “Mutual Perception of Russian and French Managers” from The International Journal of Human Resource Management (Muratbekova-Touron, 2011) https://ezproxy.snhu.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=cookie,ip,url,cpid&custid=shapiro&db=bth&AN=60610752&site=ehost-live
Consider the characteristics studied by these researchers, such as hierarchy, time, neutral vs. emotional, human nature, and so forth. Write a 3-5 page essay outlining tactics an HR manager can take to improve work performance, considering differences in cultural perception and stereotypes. Use your experience, the research, and the lecture to create a plan to approach these differences as an HR Manager
In your article analysis:
- Briefly summarize the article (1-3 paragraphs).
- Identify and describe the characteristics studied by the researchers
- Consider differences in cultural perception and stereotypes.
- Create a management plan outlining tactics an HR manager can implement to improve work performance, based on readings, research, and your experience.
Guidelines
The article analysis must follow these formatting guidelines: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and APA citations. Page length requirements: 3-5 pages, not including cover page and references.
Rubric for Article Analysis Two/Module Six
| Critical Elements | Exemplary | Proficient | Needs Improvement | Not Evident | Value |
| Summary of the article | N/A | Includes a brief summary of the article (10) | N/A | Does not includes a summary of the article (0) | 10 |
| Discussion of research characteristics | Submission meets “Proficient” and includes other characteristics in addition to those listed (18-20) | Discusses characteristics studied by the researchers: hierarchy, time, neutral vs. emotional, human nature (16-17) | Only discusses 1-2 of the characteristics studied by the researchers (14-15) | Does not discuss characteristics studied by the researchers (0-13) | 20 |
| Differences in cultural perception and stereotypes | Submission meets “Proficient” and includes illustrative examples (18-20) | Considers differences in cultural perception and stereotypes, and how they might be overcome (16-17) | Considers differences in cultural perception and/or stereotypes in only a basic manner (14-15) | Does not consider differences in cultural perception and stereotypes (0-13) | 20 |
| Management plan/tactics for improving performance around researched characteristics | Submission meets “Proficient” and extends explanation to include supporting evidence from scholarly resources (18-20) | Suggests 2-4 tactics in a plan for improving performance (16-17) | Suggests only a single tactic for improving performance, or the tactic(s) suggested are not appropriate (14-15) | Does not suggests tactics for improving performance (0-13) | 20 |
| Course Vocabulary | Meets “Proficient” and integrates the course vocabulary into all aspects of the analysis (14-15) | Applies vocabulary for HR throughout case study (12-13) | Lists some vocabulary or phrases, but it is not connected to the context of the questions (11) | Does not include HR vocabulary (0-10) | 15 |
| Articulation of Response | Submission is free of errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format (14-15) | Submission has no major errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization (12-13) | Submission has major errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas (11) | Submission has critical errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas (0-10) | 15 |
| Total Comments: | 100% |
