0% Plagiarism Guaranteed & Custom Written

Identify management theories relevant to your role (12 marks)ASSIGNMENT TASK for Unit: Developing Critical Thinking

01 / 10 / 2021 Others

This paper circulates around the core theme of Identify management theories relevant to your role (12 marks)ASSIGNMENT TASK for Unit: Developing Critical Thinking together with its essential aspects. It has been reviewed and purchased by the majority of students thus, this paper is rated 4.8 out of 5 points by the students. In addition to this, the price of this paper commences from £ 99. To get this paper written from the scratch, order this assignment now. 100% confidential, 100% plagiarism-free.


Be able to critically assess the validity of management theories in relation to own beliefs, attitudes and values

 

Identify management theories, making clear why they are relevant to your role, and use applicable theoretical models or techniques to critically assess the impact of own beliefs, attitudes and values on the theories to make a judgement.

 

You are then required to use this critical assessment to evaluate and reach a conclusion as to how someone with different, beliefs, attitudes and values might interpret the theory differently.

Identify management theories relevant to your role (12 marks)ASSIGNMENT TASK for Unit: Developing Critical Thinking

Centre NumberCentre Name
Learner Registration NoLearner Name
TASK

The purpose of this unit is to develop the ability to think and reflect critically as required by a potential or practising middle manager.

 

note

An ILM Assessment Task provides an opportunity to relate your learning directly to your current organisation.  It is recommended that you discuss the assignment with your line manager to explore and agree how the task could be used to support the needs of your employer (as well as evidencing your learning as part of completing your ILM qualification).

 

If you are not currently working within an organisation, then you may complete this task in relation to an organisation with which you are familiar. This could include experience working in a voluntary capacity

 

The nominal word count for this assignment is 2500 words: The suggested range is between 2000 and 3000 words, however individuals have different writing styles, and there is no penalty if the word-count range is exceeded.

 

Please use the headings shown below when writing up your assignmentAssessment Criteria
Be able to critically assess own beliefs, attitudes and value systems

 

Provide a correct and appropriate explanation of the difference between beliefs, attitudes and values and the cognitive structure of beliefs, attitudes and values, and to use relevant theoretical models or techniques to critically assess and make a judgement on how beliefs, attitudes and values impact on own behaviour.

 

 

·        Explain the difference between beliefs, attitudes and values (16 marks)

·        Critically assess the impact of beliefs, attitudes and values on own behaviour (24 marks)

·

·       Critically assess the impact of own beliefs, attitudes and values on a management theory relevant to your role (24 marks)

·       Use the critical assessment to evaluate how someone with different beliefs, attitudes and values might interpret the theory differently (24 marks)

 

By submitting I confirm that this assessment is my own work


 

 

 

 

MARK SHEET – Developing Critical Thinking

Centre Number : Centre Name : 
Learner Registration No : Learner Name: 
INSTRUCTIONS FOR ASSESSMENT AND USE OF MARK SHEET

Assessment must be conducted with reference to the assessment criteria (AC). In order to pass the unit, every AC must be met.

Assessors will normally award marks for every AC and then total them into a percentage.  However, for greater simplicity, there is the option to not use marks at all and merely indicate with a ‘Pass’ or ‘Referral’ in the box (below right).  In order to pass the unit every AC must receive a ‘Pass’

Where marks are awarded according to the degree to which the learner’s evidence in the submission meets each AC, every AC must be met, i.e. receive at least half marks (e.g. min 10/20).  Any AC awarded less than the minimum produces an automatic referral for the submission (regardless of the overall mark achieved).

Sufficiency descriptors are provided as guidance.  If 20 marks are available for an AC and the evidence in the submission approximates to the ‘pass’ descriptor, that indicates it should attract 10 marks out of 20, if a ‘good pass’ then ca. 15 out of 20.  The descriptors are not comprehensive, and cannot be, as there are many ways in which a submission can exceed or fall short of the requirements.

 

 

1.    Learner named above confirms authenticity of submission.

 

2.    ILM uses learners’ submissions – on an anonymous basis – for assessment standardisation.  By submitting, I agree that ILM may use this script on condition that all information which may identify me is removed.

 

However, if you are unwilling to allow ILM use your  script, please refuse by ticking the box: 

 

Learning Outcome / Section 1:  Be able to critically assess own beliefs, attitudes and value systems
Assessment Criteria (AC)Sufficiency Descriptors

[Typical standard that , if replicated across the whole submission, would produce a referral, borderline pass or good pass result]

Assessor feedback on AC

[comments not necessary in every box]

 

AC 1.1

Explain the difference between beliefs, attitudes and values

Referral [ca. 4/16]Pass [8/16]Good Pass [ca. 12/16] 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

·         Beliefs, attitudes and values are merely listed or individually defined or described

·         There is no explanation of the difference between beliefs, attitudes and values, or the explanation is incorrect, or there is no explanation of the cognitive structure of beliefs, attitudes and values

 

·         There is a limited but sufficient and correct explanation of the difference between beliefs, attitudes and values and the cognitive structure of beliefs, attitudes and values

 

·         There is a comprehensive explanation of the difference between beliefs, attitudes and values and the cognitive structure of beliefs, attitudes and values using appropriate theoretical models

 

/ 16

(min. of 8)

Pass or Referral
 

AC 1.2

Critically assess the impact of beliefs, attitudes and values on own behaviour

Referral [ca. 6/24]Pass [12/24]Good Pass [ca. 18/24] 

 

 

 

 

 

·         No impact on behaviour is provided, or the impact is merely listed or described rather than critically assessed, or the impact is not evidenced as being attributable to beliefs, attitudes and values·         How beliefs, attitudes and values impact on own behaviour is critically assessed using a relevant theoretical model(s) or technique(s) to make a limited but sufficient judgement·         How beliefs, attitudes and values impact on own behaviour is critically assessed using a relevant theoretical model(s) or technique(s) to make a detailed judgement

 

 

 

Assessment comments (optional):Verification comments (optional):

 

 

Learning Outcome / Section 2:  Be able to critically assess the validity of management theories in relation to own beliefs, attitudes and values
Assessment Criteria (AC)Sufficiency Descriptors

[Typical standard that , if replicated across the whole submission, would produce a referral, borderline pass or good pass result]

Assessor feedback on AC

[comments not necessary in every box]

AC 2.1

Identify management theories relevant to your role

Referral [ca. 3/12]Pass [


International House, 12 Constance Street, London, United Kingdom,
E16 2DQ

Company # 11483120

Benefits You Get

  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Installment Plan
  • 24/7 Customer Support
  • Plagiarism Free Guarantee
  • 100% Confidentiality
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
  • 100% Money-Back Guarantee
  • On-Time Delivery Guarantee
FLAT 50% OFF ON EVERY ORDER. Use "FLAT50" as your promo code during checkout