This paper circulates around the core theme of exacerbated women economic inequity? together with its essential aspects. It has been reviewed and purchased by the majority of students thus, this paper is rated 4.8 out of 5 points by the students. In addition to this, the price of this paper commences from £ 99. To get this paper written from the scratch, order this assignment now. 100% confidential, 100% plagiarism-free.
For each question or set of questions, students must respond with an answer of no less than 400500 words, and must reference at least 2 of the required texts from the unit. Students are also encouraged to think about each question in relation to their own life experience, and to think about the connections between the ideas contained in each unit.
How do you think global economics affect your life?comment on 2 post belowpost 1A quote from the Womens Environment and Development Organization by Burns frames the issue whereby the organization states: Global economic and trade policies are not gender neutral. The failure of governments and intergovernmental organizations to formulate and evaluate trade policies from a gender perspective has exacerbated womens economic inequity (Hobbs & Rice, 2013, p.529). It is important to think about gender in relation to the economy because unpaid domestic work is ignored in the calculations under an international GDP model, and most of unpaid domestic work in the world is conducted by women. Women continue to be domestic workers in many parts of the world and in places where they are in the formal work force contributing to the GDP metric, they are often paid less and subject to harsh conditions. How global economy benefits from unpaid and underpaid work is complicated. Burn writes about comments from women that there are benefits to them from economic globalization because it has created jobs in areas where there were no jobs previously. From these jobs women have gained forms of independence from men and can invest in themselves in education and marriage, and they can express personal freedom (Hobbs & Rice, 2013, p.530). Conversely though, there are many negative repercussions from globalization and limited labour protection. Many areas of the world suffer from unpaid or underpaid work and offers women no security. Poor work environments have developed such as sweat shops, human trafficking, sex work, etc (Hobbs & Rice, 2013, p. 542). In a broader view, underpaid and unpaid labour that produces a product or service (whether it be through personal extortion of that labour) still produces a measurable economic benefit if there is an exchange of funds. It is through this metric that the vulnerable particularly women are marginalized for the benefit of a global marketplace. How do you think global economics affect your life?
Ill get into how it directly affects me in my work in the following paragraph(s) but first Id like to acknowledge that global economics affects me in many secondary ways. For example, the price of goods available in Canada due to low costs of production in areas of the world where labour laws and unionized work forces are weak. Id wager that everything Im using to write this post is made in an Asiatic country, the IPad I use to write my notes is designed in the United States and manufactured abroad, and delivery of those items are likely by large shipping vessels owned by a foreign company. The food I eat daily is likely from multinational sources although lately I am making efforts to buy Canadian because of some trade friction with the US. I am fortunate to be born a white male in Canada where I am not extorted for my services that so many other in the world are even right here in Canada. I acknowledge how this all affects my life but generally goes unnoticed and unappreciated even though it is a major global issue. Sadly, this issue remains unaddressed because we continue to get things that we want at a low cost and it doesnt personally affect people that have the power to institute change or at least it doesnt impact them/me enough to act. I found this documentary Whos Counting to be one of the most interesting films in the course because it is applicable on several levels to my life. Firstly, I am just wrapping up my final course this semester for my business degree and I hold investment positions in many global companies via direct investing and index funds some of which include companies that operate in regions of the world where labour laws are virtually non-existent. I also have a personal interest in business and have been a sole proprietor in the past, although I did not export products. A major point Marilyn Waring makes in the film is the ridiculous spending on warfare compared to social well being such as health care. If youve read my previous posts Im sure that at some point Ive mentioned I am a regular force military veteran (still serving) of close to 14 years. As part of my duties I have been to these military arms expos like what is shown in the film and while I am professionally motivated and interested in these expos, I am aware of what purchasing and selling this equipment does it perpetuates conflict. Our Liberal government is currently undergoing significant scrutiny of Canadian-made light armoured vehicles we (under the Conservative government) sold to Saudi-Arabia, a country that is well known for its oppression of women and other vulnerable people. It seems ridiculous to me even with my background that a public service such as the Canadian Armed Forces or any other government agency for that matter, even Canada Revenue Agency is seen as anything other than a debit on a balance sheet. Our military serves our national interests of domestic security, international collaboration, and emergency humanitarian relief such as in the wake of various environmental catastrophes (from recent memory Haiti Hurricane, Japan Tsunami, etc), but it doesnt produce a product or service that generates an economic gain other than the purchase of equipment (usually from other countries) so why is this measured as a contributor to our national well-being?A single metric to measure well-being is severely limited and tells us almost nothing about where we have problems domestically or internationally. By designing a more holistic measurement system we would be able to see what other countries are doing well and what Canada does well and implement change from a policy level to influence the true well-being of all citizens including the underpaid and unpaid. References:Hobbs, M., & Rice, C. (2013). Gender and womens studies in Canada: Critical terrain, an introductory womens and gender studies reader. Toronto, Ontario: Womens Press.Nash, T. (Director). (1995). Whos Counting?: Marilyn Waring on Sex, Lies and Global Economics [Documentary]. Canada:National Film Board.
I think that women are main component of a society, country even the world. Women should play equal roles in organization of any society, country and the world. Women should play an equal role in decision making that affect themselves. Women should play equal role in decision making in the global economy. In global economy labour is very important such that women labour in any country contributes to global economy that country may be contributing. Multinational corporations use services and labour of the women in countries where those corporations are working. Therefore, how those women are treated at work by those corporations depends on how those countries treaty their women. Burn states that jobs created for women in globalized economy pay very little and offer no security while working conditions are very poor (Hobbs and Rice 2013, 531). Women are being exploited in those industries due to poor governance or no restrictions. In a country like Canada, people may enjoy buying cheaper goods in a globalized economy. Products that are manufactured by women under harsh conditions and being paid low wages that they cannot even support themselves. The main problem is that even the products that we may buy here in Canada while being manufactured in those developing countries, The employees who make such products we buy they cannot afford to buy them because they are very expensive and they are paid very law wages. Also think of this, here in Canada we may be buying food being farmed in occupied territories of West Bank by the State of Israel while we know that women and children protesting peacefully against the occupation are being targeted and killed, abused by Israel soldiers. Else, the United States maybe enjoying oil and gas from Saudi Arabia, a country that does not regards women as equal human being. I was watching the news and Soudi Arabia just made any effort to https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-44367981 allow women to drive. Countries like united states or United Kingdom, may enjoy arms deals with Saudi, a country that is killing women and children in Yamen. Global economy affects our lives in two different ways. There are thse who are very negatively are affect and other who are positively affect. Global distribution of goods and products depends mostly on exploitation of women. Women get to work for cheap labour and the global corporations increase profits. This is so because where markets are globalized, developing countries provide labour for productions. Mostly, such cheap labour are dominated by women (Hobbs and Rice 2013). If we want to achieve gender equality on global scale where global economy benefits from women, we have to address issues of gender equality in places where women are exploited and abused for labour. But how we can achieve that is the main issue at hand because it is a complex agenda.In the movie, Who is Counting?Marilyn states that, The people who are visible to you as the contributors to the economy are the people who will be visible to you when you make the policies and if you are not visible producer in the nations economy then you are going to be invisible in the distribution of benefits. In the world where women are doing unpaid jobs of taking care of children and house, cooking for their husbands, their work is not counted, and they are not considered as contributors to the economy. Despite that, they get to stay home and support their families while other members work in paid jobs, women are not recognized for being playing the equal roles. Therefore, only those who are in paid jobs benefit in any decisions because they are the ones regarded in those decisions being made. For use who benefits positively by enjoying cheaper goods and services available on global level are beneficiaries while also others especially those in developing countries pay the prices.