This paper circulates around the core theme of A. the standard of applicability and a statement of the objection together with its essential aspects. It has been reviewed and purchased by the majority of students thus, this paper is rated 4.8 out of 5 points by the students. In addition to this, the price of this paper commences from £ 99. To get this paper written from the scratch, order this assignment now. 100% confidential, 100% plagiarism-free.
Explain how utilitarians respond to the practical objections to Utilitarianism that has to do with cases of moral
deliberation and lack of relevant information about actual consequences. In answering how utilitarians respond to
the practical objections to Utilitarianism this question, you should include a thorough discussion of the
following:
A. the standard of applicability and a statement of the objection
B. the utilitarian claim that the Principle of Utility is not a decision procedure but a moral criterion
C. the distinction between Actual Consequence Utilitarianism and Expected Consequence Utilitarianism
(NOTE: In explaining these two types of Utilitarianism and their relevance to the objection, you will have to
explain the difference between “actual utility” of actions and “expected utility” of actions, and then explain
how they can differ in the verdicts they yield. You use the “Mine Shafts” example to explain how these two
versions of Utilitarianism can differ in the verdicts they yield)
D. how this distinction between ACU and ECU relates to the distinction between objective rightness and subjective
rightness.
