This paper circulates around the core theme of 1. Reconstruct Augustine’s argument that the present has no duration. How does the fact that we can’t distinguish between two tones played 1 millisecond apart provide the basis for an objection to Augustine’s argument? together with its essential aspects. It has been reviewed and purchased by the majority of students thus, this paper is rated 4.8 out of 5 points by the students. In addition to this, the price of this paper commences from £ 99. To get this paper written from the scratch, order this assignment now. 100% confidential, 100% plagiarism-free.
The present has no duration
this should take, on average, two decent-sized paragraphs for each question using full sentences.
1. Reconstruct Augustine’s argument that the present has no duration. How does the fact that we can’t distinguish between two tones played 1 millisecond apart provide the basis for an objection to Augustine’s argument?
2. What, according to Lewis, is the grandfather paradox? Why does this paradox pose a problem for the logical possibility of time travel? What is Lewis’s preferred solution to the grandfather paradox?
3. In a paragraph, reconstruct Anselm’s ontological argument in your own words. Then explain one of Gaunilo’s objections to this argument.
4. What is intelligent design? Reconstruct the flagellum argument in favor of intelligent design that Kitcher considers and explain, in detail, one reason why Kitcher thinks this argument is a poor one.
5. Why does Pascal think we have a practical reason to believe that God exists? Explain Pascal’s argument, then articulate one of the responses to this argument discussed by Rosen.
6. What is the logical problem of evil, on what premises does it rest, and how does it lead us to the conclusion that a God with certain properties can’t exist? Recount one of the responses to the logical problem of evil that Mackie thinks is inadequate and explain why Mackie thinks this response is inadequate.
7. What is the evidential problem of evil, and how does it differ from the logical problem of evil? What does Rowe think the best theist response to the evidential problem of evil is? Describe the kind of atheism Rowe thinks we should adopt in light of the evidential problem of evil.
8. Reconstruct Holbach’s argument for hard determinism. According to van Inwagen, what is the greatest mystery still facing hard determinism?
9. What, according to Ayer, does it mean to say that we have free will? How does Ayer’s definition of free will make free will compatible with determinism?
10. Explain the principle regarding moral responsibility that Frankfurt challenges in his paper, then give an example of the kind Frankfurt discusses to show that, intuitively, this principle is false.
