0% Plagiarism Guaranteed & Custom Written

First, answer the following general questions about this area in an academically rigorous way

18 / 01 / 2019 Music

This paper circulates around the core theme of First, answer the following general questions about this area in an academically rigorous way together with its essential aspects. It has been reviewed and purchased by the majority of students thus, this paper is rated 4.8 out of 5 points by the students. In addition to this, the price of this paper commences from £ 132. To get this paper written from the scratch, order this assignment now. 100% confidential, 100% plagiarism-free.

First, answer the following general questions about this area in an academically rigorous way. It isessentialthatyouranswersarewrittenascompletesentences,inastructuredway,andthatyou cite and reference correctly when appropriate.
1. What is meant by sonification? Give some examples of what this activity might be. [3%] 2. Think about how the concept of sonification might apply to text. Describe what this might be, and give a few examples of sonification of text. [10%] 3. How does the concept of song, and of lyrics creation, link with sonification? [7%]
PartB Thesecondpartofthiscourseworkassignmentinvolvesanin-depthinvestigationoftworesearch papers that are each about a particular aspect of text sonification. For each of the papers listed below, you are to read them in depth, and present an analytical discussion of the work. This should include a description, discussion and critique of the main ideasofthepaper(eachintheformofanessay,eachamaximumof2,000words–youmaywell find that you are able to present the discussion in fewer than 2,000 words, which is absolutely fine, but do make sure you address all the relevant aspects). You may need to read additional materialinordertofullyunderstandthepapers,theirrelevanceandanycontext;thismayalsobe relevant to your critique in Part C.
I F. Alt, A.S. Shirazi, S. Legien, A. Schmidt, and J. Mennenöh, ‘Creating Meaningful Melodies from Text Messages’, in Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression(2010),pp.63-68. I D. Jones and P. Gregson,‘The listening machine: generating complex musical structure from social network communications.” in Proceedings of 50th Anniversary Convention of the AISB, Live Algorithms(London,2014),6 pages.
CO3346 Creative Computing III: 2016-17
PartC Provide a critical comparison of the work in the two papers from Part B. You should take into account the general ideas in the field and bring in your own (justified) comments about what has been done.
[20%] [Total 100%] Your submission for all of the above is to be as PDF. Please submit 3 separate documents: the firstcalledYourNamePartA.pdf,thesecondcalledYourNamePartB.pdfandthethirdcalledYourNamePartA.pdf. Do not put these submissions into an archive; you should upload them as separate files. (YourName should be your own names.) Markswillbedeductedfromworkthatisnotsubmittedinthecorrectformat,asspecified above. In particular, we do not accept word documents.

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written

International House, 12 Constance Street, London, United Kingdom,
E16 2DQ

Company # 11483120


We've produced some samples of what you can expect from our Academic Writing Service - these are created by our writers to show you the kind of high-quality work you'll receive. Take a look for yourself!

View Our Samples

Benefits You Get

  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Installment Plan
  • 24/7 Customer Support
  • Plagiarism Free Guarantee
  • 100% Confidentiality
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
  • 100% Money-Back Guarantee
  • On-Time Delivery Guarantee
FLAT 25% OFF ON EVERY ORDER. Use "FLAT25" as your promo code during checkout